Skip to content
  • Home
  • SEO News
  • Google Takes Legal Action Against SerpApi for Scraping Violations
Google sues SerpApi over search scraping in copyright lawsuit

Google Takes Legal Action Against SerpApi for Scraping Violations

Overview of the Lawsuit

On December 19, 2025, Google filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against SerpApi in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 25-10826. Google accuses the Texas-based company of bypassing its SearchGuard technology to extract copyrighted content from search results. The suit seeks statutory damages ranging from $200 to $2,500 for each circumvention act and injunctive relief to halt operations. Given SerpApi’s processing of hundreds of millions of automated queries daily, the potential liability could surpass the company’s reported annual revenue of a few million dollars.

Google’s SearchGuard Technology

Launched in January 2025, Google’s SearchGuard is designed to protect against automated scraping. It issues JavaScript challenges to unrecognized queries, requiring proof of human origin through browser-transmitted data. While legitimate users pass through without issues, scrapers typically fail, blocking access to search results containing copyrighted material. Google’s robots.txt and Terms of Service explicitly prohibit automated access to its search content.

SerpApi’s Operations and Tactics

Founded in 2017 by Julien Khaleghy, SerpApi markets itself as a provider of APIs for scraping Google search data. The company generates revenue by reselling this data via subscriptions. Following the rollout of SearchGuard, SerpApi developed various circumvention tactics, including using fake browsers and misrepresenting device information. Their blog post admits to bypassing Google’s protections, stating that they have pre-solved challenges and remain confident in their ability to adapt to future changes.

Alleged Violations and Relief Sought

The lawsuit claims SerpApi violated DMCA Section 1201 by circumventing technological protections, with query volumes surging by as much as 25,000% in two years. Google emphasizes that these activities impose additional infrastructure costs without revenue offsets. The relief sought includes halting such circumvention, destroying tools used for scraping, and compensatory damages. Google’s General Counsel articulated that this suit aims to protect content partners’ rights and choices regarding access to their material.

Broader Industry Implications

This lawsuit marks SerpApi’s second major legal challenge in 2025, echoing ongoing industry tensions regarding scraping, particularly for AI training. On October 22, Reddit also sued SerpApi for similar allegations, likening data scraping to robbing an armored truck. This incident highlights a growing trend of litigation aimed at safeguarding intellectual property against unauthorized data extraction, particularly as AI systems increasingly rely on scraped content without compensating original creators.

The outcome of this lawsuit may set precedents affecting how APIs and data scraping companies operate moving forward. As Google continues to pursue legal remedies against scrapers, SEO professionals and content marketers must reassess their strategies, especially in light of potential changes to access and use of search data.

In the next 6–12 months, expect increased vigilance from platforms like Google in protecting their content and potentially more lawsuits targeting scraping services. Businesses relying on scraped data will face heightened operational risks as legal frameworks tighten around data use and copyright protections.

Post List #3

Google Search Console impressions bug ran for nearly a year unnoticed

Google Search Console’s Impressions Bug: a Year of Inflated Metrics

Marc LaClear Apr 4, 2026 4 min read

Overview of the Impressions Bug Google confirmed a significant logging error in Search Console that has inflated impression counts since May 13, 2025. The company formally acknowledged the issue on April 3, 2026, affecting one of the most relied-upon data…

Why your content doesn’t appear in AI Overviews (even if it ranks in the top 10)

Why Your Top-Ranked Content Is Missing From AI Overviews

Marc LaClear Apr 2, 2026 4 min read

The New Reality of AI Overviews Despite optimizing your website to perform well, you might find your top-ranking pages absent from Google‘s AI Overviews. This discrepancy arises not from a failure to rank but from a fundamental shift in how…

6 Google Ads mistakes that hurt ecommerce campaigns

Six Google Ads Pitfalls That Undermine Ecommerce Success

Marc LaClear Apr 2, 2026 4 min read

Understanding the Mistakes Many brands transitioning from paid social to Google Ads stumble into traps that drain budgets without delivering growth. The common missteps usually stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of how Google operates compared to platforms like Meta. Those…

Google adds channel performance timeline view to PMax campaigns

Google’s New Timeline View for Pmax Campaigns: What You Need…

Marc LaClear Apr 2, 2026 3 min read

Timeline View Enhances Channel Performance Reporting Google has rolled out a timeline view for channel performance within Performance Max (PMax) campaigns, a feature that promises to refine how advertisers analyze their channel performance over time. This follows the initial launch…

EU hospitality groups raise concerns over Google search rankings

EU Hospitality Groups Challenge Google’s Search Ranking Manipulation

Marc LaClear Apr 2, 2026 3 min read

Recent Timeline of EU Hospitality Concerns on Google Rankings On April 2, 2026, EU hospitality groups voiced significant concerns regarding Google’s search ranking practices, particularly the favoritism shown towards intermediaries like Booking.com. This comes on the heels of closed-door workshops…